<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scriptable vs Visual?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thekua.com/atwork/2008/11/scriptable-vs-visual/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thekua.com/atwork/2008/11/scriptable-vs-visual/</link>
	<description>thekua&#039;s reflections on work related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 08:14:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.thekua.com/atwork/2008/11/scriptable-vs-visual/comment-page-1/#comment-34446</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 10:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thekua.com/atwork/2008/11/scriptable-vs-visual/#comment-34446</guid>
		<description>Hi Felix - I also agree that these approaches aren&#039;t mutually exclusive. Rather, most people seem to prioritise the visual over the scriptable without any conscious decision, and the result is a useful application but only accessible with a mouse!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Felix &#8211; I also agree that these approaches aren&#8217;t mutually exclusive. Rather, most people seem to prioritise the visual over the scriptable without any conscious decision, and the result is a useful application but only accessible with a mouse!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: felix</title>
		<link>http://www.thekua.com/atwork/2008/11/scriptable-vs-visual/comment-page-1/#comment-34276</link>
		<dc:creator>felix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 13:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thekua.com/atwork/2008/11/scriptable-vs-visual/#comment-34276</guid>
		<description>I also think that those two approaches are actually not mutually exclusive. It has more to do with the way we do UI. Essentially I think  the UI should be a very thin wrapper around the application layer (or presentation model, if you prefer that expression). Time and again I see people calling from their presentation model into the view layer.

Watch out for the typical excuses: &quot;I just have to set the initial value&quot;, &quot;My presentation layer doesn&#039;t know about the actual UI, there is an interface in between&quot;.

This of course is killing scriptability and testability at the same time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also think that those two approaches are actually not mutually exclusive. It has more to do with the way we do UI. Essentially I think  the UI should be a very thin wrapper around the application layer (or presentation model, if you prefer that expression). Time and again I see people calling from their presentation model into the view layer.</p>
<p>Watch out for the typical excuses: &#8220;I just have to set the initial value&#8221;, &#8220;My presentation layer doesn&#8217;t know about the actual UI, there is an interface in between&#8221;.</p>
<p>This of course is killing scriptability and testability at the same time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
