<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RamDisk utilities for Windows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thekua.com/atwork/2008/09/ramdisk-utilities-for-windows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thekua.com/atwork/2008/09/ramdisk-utilities-for-windows/</link>
	<description>thekua&#039;s reflections on work related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:25:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.thekua.com/atwork/2008/09/ramdisk-utilities-for-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-29151</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 06:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thekua.com/atwork/2008/09/22/ramdisk-utilities-for-windows/#comment-29151</guid>
		<description>I wasn&#039;t doing any tests about whether or not it increased performance, as I was looking more for the latter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn&#8217;t doing any tests about whether or not it increased performance, as I was looking more for the latter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: felix</title>
		<link>http://www.thekua.com/atwork/2008/09/ramdisk-utilities-for-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-29121</link>
		<dc:creator>felix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 23:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thekua.com/atwork/2008/09/22/ramdisk-utilities-for-windows/#comment-29121</guid>
		<description>Did you actually find if ramdisks did improve the performance, or were you just after a cheap disposable file system...

My impression a few years back was, that a ramdisk is actually not that much faster as a hard drive, when it comes to small amounts of data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you actually find if ramdisks did improve the performance, or were you just after a cheap disposable file system&#8230;</p>
<p>My impression a few years back was, that a ramdisk is actually not that much faster as a hard drive, when it comes to small amounts of data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
